Reports: United Airlines to lay off nearly 1,200
UAL Corp., the parent company of United Airlines, plans to lay off 1,190 workers in early 2009 as part of a previously announced plan to cut about 7,000 jobs, according to media reports. (UAUA)
TSG sells stake in Meguiar's
TSG Consumer Partners, a San Francisco private equity firm, recently sold its stake in Meguiar’s, an auto-polish maker based in Irvine. (MMM)
Northrop to sponsor D.C. bowl game
Northrop Grumman Corp. is the latest founding sponsor to join the growing list for the inaugural EagleBank Bowl, announced the D.C. Bowl Committee Inc. (NOC)
Activision inks deal with Microsoft unit
Activision Blizzard Inc. has signed a deal with Microsoft Corp. subsidiary Massive Inc. allowing Massive to provide a platform for dynamic, in-game advertising for 18 of Activision's titles, including "Guitar Hero: World Tour" and "James Bond: Quantum of Solace." (MSFT) (ATVI)
Boeing teaming with Hollywood company
The Boeing Co. is going Hollywood for new training systems for the military and law enforcement, striking a deal with Creative Technologies Inc. (BA)
Skechers, Crocs settle litigation
Skechers USA Inc. and Crocs Inc. said Wednesday that they have settled all litigation involving a patent dispute between the two companies. (CROX) (SKX)
Jacobs gets contract from USMC
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. has received a Joint Equipment Assessment Program contract from the United States Marine Corps worth up to $89 million. (JEC)
Honda sales plunge 32% in November
The recession continued to make a mark on Honda Motor Co. Ltd.’s sales, which fell by a third in November from a year earlier, the automaker reported Tuesday.
California???s gas use drops 8%
Californians used 8.3 percent less gas in August than they did in the same month in 2007, while gas prices climbed 40 percent in the same time period.
UnitedHealth: Health plan enrollment to decline in '09
UnitedHealth Group Inc. is predicting that it will lose hundreds of thousands of members from its health plan rolls in 2009, with declining or flat profit. (UNH)


tax on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property.

(4) The liability for taxes applied to a particular activity or transaction which occurred before either of the following:

(A) Before the board rescinded or modified the advice so given, by sending written notice to the person of the rescinded or modified advice.

(B) Before a change in statutory or constitutional law, a change in the board’s regulations, or a final decision of a court, which renders the board’s earlier written advice no longer valid.

(c) Any person seeking relief under this section shall file with the board:
(1) A copy of the person’s written request to the board and a copy of the board’s written advice.
(2) A statement under penalty of perjury setting forth the facts on which the claim for relief is based.
(3) Any other information which the board may require.
(d) Only the person making the written request shall be entitled to rely on the board’s written advice to that person.

The following examples represent some typical appeals;

Case #1
Petitioner entered into a contract to fabricate and install storage tanks at a California location for a lump sum price. He took a resale certificate from his customer and did not charge or pay sales tax on the transaction.

The auditor regarded the contract as a construction contract and asserted tax based on the cost to petitioner of materials used to fabricate the tanks. The auditor did not accept the resale certificate because he regarded petitioner as the consumer of the materials

The petitioner stated he was instructed by a Board employee over the telephone to obtain a resale certificate.

The petition was denied.

Subdivision (b) (6) of Regulation 1521 provides that a contractor cannot avoid liability for tax on materials or fixtures furnished and installed by him by taking a resale certificate. The reason is the sale occurs after the property has changed from personal property to real property by virtue of its installation.

Section 6596 provides the Board may grant relief from a failure to pay if the failure resulted from reliance upon written advice from a Board employee which is in response to a written request for advice. The petition further alleged he received erroneous advice. The decision in the Fischbach & Moore, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization (1981) 117 Cal. App. 3d 627 held that erroneous advice from an employee of the Board cannot create an exemption which is not authorized by law.

Case #2

The taxpayer contended he should not be held liable for tax because he received information during a previous audit that indicated tax would not be due on transaction similar to those at issue in his new audit.

The petition was denied.

The Board held that the circumstances in the new audit were sufficiently different from the previous audit and the transactions were substantially different. However, in the analysis of the case a rather revealing statement is made. “Revenue and Taxation Code section 6596 provides the only basis for relief from tax, penalty or interest based on the receipt of erroneous advice from the Board... The Board considers written evidence of erroneous advice that is contained in a prior audit report to constitute such written advice from the Board.”

This decision clearly states prior audits constitute written advice and that relying on erroneous advice in a previous audit does provide relief from the tax.

Case #3

During an audit in the late seventies the taxpayer obtained a letter from a field audit supervisor that confirmed he was told the piece of equipment he sold was classified as machinery and equipment. In a subsequent review a different auditor cited another case that supported the board’s position and that type of equipment was in fact taxable. A revised audit was prepared. When the taxpayer filed a claim for refund citing 6596 the petition was denied.

The analysis stated while the letter the taxpayer had received in the seventies did provide for relief under 6596, because the board had officially changed its opinion on the matter six years later the new opinion canceled the written proof the taxpayer had previously received.

The examples are provided for the readers to show the imperative nature of receiving written advice from the board. It is mandatory. However, the examples also reveal the information that flows from the Board can be inconsistent and in many cases conflicting. Because the Board is the ultimate judge (during the appeal) it is incumbent on the taxpayer to obtain written documentation in every case.

It is also important taxpayers read the Tax Bulletin that is mailed out by the Board with each return. Any policy or position change by the Board that reverses previous written advice can be controverted by the mere inclusion of printing and mailing it in the Tax Bulletin. It has been held that this method of notifying taxpayers constitutes written advice of the change of position.

Regulation 1705 was officially adopted on July 31, 1997 and it seems to clear up some of the upheaval in the Board as to what constitutes proof and what should be accepted from that point forward. Two major victories for taxpayers under this new regulation are the automatic inclusion of prior audits and the clarifying statement that reads in pertinent part;

The term “written advice” includes advice that was incorrect at the time it was issued as well as advice that was correct at the time it was issued, but, subsequent to issuance, was invalidated by a change in statutory or constitutional law, by a change in Board regulations, or by a final decision of a court of competent jurisdiction.”

In spite of every attempt by the Board or taxpayers to reduce confusion, because of the complex nature of the laws and the shear weight of training thousands of auditors to understand every facet of the law, a prudent taxpayer should always protect himself. The axiom of getting all advice in writing must prevail.

Article Source: http://www.article-matrix.com

Thomas A. Alston is the president of Aero & Marine Tax Professionals (www.aeromarinetaxpros.com). He has successfully filed hundreds of tax returns with the California State Board of Equalization. Mr. Alston is California's premier specialist in legitimate tax avoidance on aircraft, vessels and vehicles, having published many articles on sales and use tax.

Here are some more financial planning articles...