WRIT pays $58.3M for apartment building in Northwest D.C.Washington Real Estate Investment Trust has paid $58.3 million for the Kenmore, a 374-unit apartment building in D.C. (WRE)
<p><a href="http://feeds.bizjournals.com/~a/bizj_washington?a=rvLIs2"><img src="http://feeds.bizjournals.com/~a/bizj_washington?i=rvLIs2" border="0"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.bizjournals.com/~f/bizj_washington?a=e9SgLL"><img src="http://feeds.bizjournals.com/~f/bizj_washington?i=e9SgLL" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.bizjournals.com/~f/bizj_washington?a=L8yX8l"><img src="http://feeds.bizjournals.com/~f/bizj_washington?i=L8yX8l" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.bizjournals.com/~f/bizj_washington?a=RlFxLl"><img src="http://feeds.bizjournals.com/~f/bizj_washington?i=RlFxLl" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.bizjournals.com/~f/bizj_washington?a=ay7k4L"><img src="http://feeds.bizjournals.com/~f/bizj_washington?i=ay7k4L" border="0"></img></a>
</div>Report: median salary up in D.C. area this yearThe median salary increased 4.5 percent in the D.C. area this year, according to the new compensation survey from the Human Resource Association of the National Capital Area.
<p><a href="http://feeds.bizjournals.com/~a/bizj_washington?a=OhMDoV"><img src="http://feeds.bizjournals.com/~a/bizj_washington?i=OhMDoV" border="0"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.bizjournals.com/~f/bizj_washington?a=xOf7mL"><img src="http://feeds.bizjournals.com/~f/bizj_washington?i=xOf7mL" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.bizjournals.com/~f/bizj_washington?a=6mrkal"><img src="http://feeds.bizjournals.com/~f/bizj_washington?i=6mrkal" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.bizjournals.com/~f/bizj_washington?a=1SEsTl"><img src="http://feeds.bizjournals.com/~f/bizj_washington?i=1SEsTl" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.bizjournals.com/~f/bizj_washington?a=jV2PkL"><img src="http://feeds.bizjournals.com/~f/bizj_washington?i=jV2PkL" border="0"></img></a>
</div>
beds kept free of weeds. The inside needs dusting; the carpet needs vacuuming and the windows need washing. Eventually, in many people's minds, these become reasons to sell.
I would invite you to put a pencil to this. Look at hiring someone to come in and clean. Hire a lawn maintenance company or the teen-ager down the street trying to pay for his car. Having these things taken care of in this manner is a lot less expensive than moving to a retirement home.
If the home is too big, close some rooms off. If it cost too much to heat or cool, seal the vents in un-used rooms.
Sometimes it may make sense (both for the senior and the child) for one of the children to move in and serve as a caretaker, cook, lawn-cutter and/or pool boy/girl.
There are several ways to get the equity out of the home, while continuing to live in the home.
First, the home could be re-financed. Mortgage interest rates today are low. Properly invested, the funds released could cover the new mortgage payments. If not, the difference could be less expensive than rent. Depending on the person's age, putting a part of the proceeds into an immediate annuity may even cover the mortgage payment and then some.
If the person has a retirement plan that mandates required minimum distributions starting at age 70 1/2, the interest deduction on the new mortgage could be a welcome offset to the RMDs, which must be included in taxable income.
For large estates subject to estate taxes, placing the home in a Qualified Personal Residence Trust (QPRT) can potentially remove the home, and any appreciation from the date of the transfer into the trust, from the taxable estate. Proper trust drafting can also provide for the housing needs of the survivor of a married couple and, ultimately, leave the home to the children.
Selling the home to the children is another option. By structuring the sale and lease back according to the rules, the $250,000 single person or $500,000 married couple capital gains tax exclusion could apply. Here, again, the parents would continue to live in the home and pay rent to the children. This removes the home from the taxable estate as well.
A gift-leaseback is an alternative. The value of the home will use up part (or all) of the lifetime unified credit. Consult a tax attorney if the value of the home is large and this option is one of the ones on the table.
If the homeowner(s) are age 62 or older, a reverse mortgage may be a viable option. The National Council on Aging calculates there are 13.2 million seniors who could qualify for a reverse mortgage of $20,000 or more. The average would be $72,000.
Reverse mortgages can reduce or eliminate the children's inheritance. Today, there are Federal Rules for reverse mortgages and about 90% are federally insured. Fees can be high and will differ among lenders. Shop around.
Prior to making the decision to stay in the home or sell, each of these options should be part of the discussion among the senior, their children and financial advisors.
Article Source: http://articlecrazy.com
Robert D. Cavanaugh, CLU is a 36-year financial and estate planning veteran and author of the free newsletter, "The Estate Preservation Advisor". For cutting-edge, easy-to-understand resources and techniques to increase your income, reduce taxes and preserve your estate, go to theestatepreservationadvisor.com/freevideo.htm
Here are some more financial planning articles...
